kranuck
No user record in our sample, but kranuck has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but kranuck has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
> Because that's what many AI experts are also talking about from a variety of angles. Wow, in that case I'm convinced. Such an unbiased group with nothing at all to gain from massive AI hype.
If you ignore the part where there proofs are meandering drivel, sure.
That's no guarantee that AI continues advancing at the same pace, and no one has been arguing against overall technological progress slowing Refining technology is easier than the original breakthrough, but it doesn't…
It's gonna be massive because companies love to replace humans at any opportunity and they don't care at all about quality in a lot of places. For example, why hire any call center workers? They already outsourced the…
Really, cause I remember an endless stream of people pointing out problems with blockchain and crypto and being constantly assured that it was being worked on and would be solved and crypto is inevitable. For example,…
> have no idea whether the LLM understood what I’m asking That's easy. The answer is it doesn't. It has no understanding of anything it does. > if it’s able to do it This is the hard part.
That problems feels somewhat fundamental to saying that these things have any ability to reason at all.
> For example, in the future we may wish to monitor the chain of thought for signs of manipulating the user I'm sick of these clowns couching everything in "look how amazing and powerful and dangerous out AI is" This is…
> 11. This is all low-level pedantry Yeah pretty much. maybe don't write contradictory unexplained nonsense.
Yeah I stopped with 5 and 6 and will never give the slightest care what this person has to say ever again.
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]