They still are.
Building data centers sounds like a good bet to make some money in the next decade or so. That’s not the same as conceding that “everyone should get as much compute as they demand”.
How do you figure that? And if it exceeds what we can generate, a very big number is as unsatisfiable as infinity Dyson spheres are science fiction. Science fiction is fiction.
So infinite? There’s no amount of compute that would satisfy everyone’s needs and demands.
To be fair the other country routinely deploys military against citizens, and deports non-citizens for speech.
They have a fantastic media team.
Not replying directly to OP, just to people who never coded in C++. Clang-format doesn’t save you from all C++ footguns, e.g. using exceptions, macros or templates in the wrong way where „wrong“ is defined by a fuzzy…
Hmm, so… what happened while it was online? Any scandals?
When is it coming online? I have seen so many of these headlines that I feel it's always about to kick in, but I never get any closure.
I say let him cook. The real ones will know when it's good and ready, and hype driven folks can't be saved anyway.
Not enough to cover labs' expenses.
People aren't paying trillions to train them to be helpful. They want to make quadrillions.
Too bad the educational use case doesn't make any money. Good LLMs are a game changer for people motivated to learn.
How does he get to decide what's "enough"? Reality will tell us, he can only place bets, whether it pans out isn't something that he has any say in.
Let's keep going. I almost have enough for _.
Idk if this is universal but as soon as I’m on vacation I start learning new things, reading, and getting creative. When I work, my brain is fried from work. On the weekends I need a long period of idleness to recover…
The Guardian is so complicit in reinforcing all of those misleading, industry-driven narratives that it’s not even funny. Completely co-opted. Philosophers should be used in RL training to train the model how to reason…
This isn’t going to get fixed in my lifetime, and that’s sad. Countries have lost the ability to act.
China has its own ideology which upholds the power structures over there. It's very different from its western counterpart. Part of it is that yes there may not be freedom of expression, but thanks to the Party's…
Not quite. In some cases we’re certain there’s no benefit.
Ideology isn't something you can avoid. It's always present in a society to support the power structures. Conflating "just having markets" with the current form of capitalism in western countries is exactly the kind of…
I'm sceptical, do you have any data to back this up?
That's most certainly not what happens! The money that goes into buying a stock is being transferred to the people who sold you the stock (which, outside of the IPO are almost always market players). A company with a…
That does sometimes happen - investment does cause development. The mistake is to assume that's always what happens, and that everybody can benefit from the development.
You're conflating compounding market value with economic growth. One counterexample is when inflation raises prices, but not economic output. Asset prices grow but there's no growth.
They still are.
Building data centers sounds like a good bet to make some money in the next decade or so. That’s not the same as conceding that “everyone should get as much compute as they demand”.
How do you figure that? And if it exceeds what we can generate, a very big number is as unsatisfiable as infinity Dyson spheres are science fiction. Science fiction is fiction.
So infinite? There’s no amount of compute that would satisfy everyone’s needs and demands.
To be fair the other country routinely deploys military against citizens, and deports non-citizens for speech.
They have a fantastic media team.
Not replying directly to OP, just to people who never coded in C++. Clang-format doesn’t save you from all C++ footguns, e.g. using exceptions, macros or templates in the wrong way where „wrong“ is defined by a fuzzy…
Hmm, so… what happened while it was online? Any scandals?
When is it coming online? I have seen so many of these headlines that I feel it's always about to kick in, but I never get any closure.
I say let him cook. The real ones will know when it's good and ready, and hype driven folks can't be saved anyway.
Not enough to cover labs' expenses.
People aren't paying trillions to train them to be helpful. They want to make quadrillions.
Too bad the educational use case doesn't make any money. Good LLMs are a game changer for people motivated to learn.
How does he get to decide what's "enough"? Reality will tell us, he can only place bets, whether it pans out isn't something that he has any say in.
Let's keep going. I almost have enough for _.
Idk if this is universal but as soon as I’m on vacation I start learning new things, reading, and getting creative. When I work, my brain is fried from work. On the weekends I need a long period of idleness to recover…
The Guardian is so complicit in reinforcing all of those misleading, industry-driven narratives that it’s not even funny. Completely co-opted. Philosophers should be used in RL training to train the model how to reason…
This isn’t going to get fixed in my lifetime, and that’s sad. Countries have lost the ability to act.
China has its own ideology which upholds the power structures over there. It's very different from its western counterpart. Part of it is that yes there may not be freedom of expression, but thanks to the Party's…
Not quite. In some cases we’re certain there’s no benefit.
Ideology isn't something you can avoid. It's always present in a society to support the power structures. Conflating "just having markets" with the current form of capitalism in western countries is exactly the kind of…
I'm sceptical, do you have any data to back this up?
That's most certainly not what happens! The money that goes into buying a stock is being transferred to the people who sold you the stock (which, outside of the IPO are almost always market players). A company with a…
That does sometimes happen - investment does cause development. The mistake is to assume that's always what happens, and that everybody can benefit from the development.
You're conflating compounding market value with economic growth. One counterexample is when inflation raises prices, but not economic output. Asset prices grow but there's no growth.