It seems to you what?
Attribution of malware can be difficult and the lack of details like who was targeted and missing plugins don't leave enough information to guess who might have been interested in developing this.
I don’t normally see ARM with thumb code so I couldn’t tell you. I am fairly certain it is supported but to what degree I am uncertain.
I regularly look at ARM software and firmware. There are certain things that IDA does better, like FLIRT analysis, which I’ve missed since switching to Ghidra. Ghidra also currently lacks support for certain ARM…
I don't understand how this differentiates itself from ARM TrustZone. You can already create a system with a dedicated HSM and run your own trusted operating system using the features of the processor. With Intel SGX…
Making something closed source does not make your product more secure, it only makes it harder to look at. Determined people will still try to understand how your software works in order to accomplish their goals.
It seems to you what?
Attribution of malware can be difficult and the lack of details like who was targeted and missing plugins don't leave enough information to guess who might have been interested in developing this.
I don’t normally see ARM with thumb code so I couldn’t tell you. I am fairly certain it is supported but to what degree I am uncertain.
I regularly look at ARM software and firmware. There are certain things that IDA does better, like FLIRT analysis, which I’ve missed since switching to Ghidra. Ghidra also currently lacks support for certain ARM…
I don't understand how this differentiates itself from ARM TrustZone. You can already create a system with a dedicated HSM and run your own trusted operating system using the features of the processor. With Intel SGX…
Making something closed source does not make your product more secure, it only makes it harder to look at. Determined people will still try to understand how your software works in order to accomplish their goals.