Thank you for the pointers. I will try to get involved, unfortunately I won't have much time for it in the near future.
While I think that Tectonic can have benefits for those coming to "TeX", ConTeXt is by all means superior to all other TeXs and even Tectonic. While at the core there is always a TeX engine (original TeX, pdfTeX, XeTeX,…
I too have recently been interested in TeX and Rust. Apart from Tectonic (wrapper around XeTeX and dvipdfmx) and the attempt to rewrite it in Rust (your first link), I also found [1], an attempt to rewrite TeX itself in…
Recently I have been also thinking about TeX's internals, also because I feel the pain points you describe in at https://www.finl.xyz/. I have too thought about experimenting with TeX rewrites/alternatives and…
Exactly! Have you found any decent replacement?
Would you happen to know the origin of this diagram? I like the font and overall style.
Thank you for the pointers. I will try to get involved, unfortunately I won't have much time for it in the near future.
While I think that Tectonic can have benefits for those coming to "TeX", ConTeXt is by all means superior to all other TeXs and even Tectonic. While at the core there is always a TeX engine (original TeX, pdfTeX, XeTeX,…
I too have recently been interested in TeX and Rust. Apart from Tectonic (wrapper around XeTeX and dvipdfmx) and the attempt to rewrite it in Rust (your first link), I also found [1], an attempt to rewrite TeX itself in…
Recently I have been also thinking about TeX's internals, also because I feel the pain points you describe in at https://www.finl.xyz/. I have too thought about experimenting with TeX rewrites/alternatives and…
Exactly! Have you found any decent replacement?
Would you happen to know the origin of this diagram? I like the font and overall style.