No amount of Ruby on Rails, agile standups, or awesome design is going to help make that unique special connection between two people. I think if you're looking systematically for the love of your life, you're doing it…
Can you explain why you think there's no such thing as true referential transparency? I'd disagree with that statement, so I'm interested as to what you mean, and what your arguments are. Thanks.
"there are no vtable passed around nor attached to "objects" in Haskell" Err... what the fuck? That's exactly how they work. http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/OOP_vs_type_classes#Type_... Read about the 'dictionary'…
The two guys in the middle of that photo look like total brogrammers.
"I haven't read the article but..." So it's come to this on HN...
Well at least she's learnt something.
Just get her to restore from her most recent backup. She does have a backup, doesn't she? If she didn't bother to backup, she doesn't have much right to be upset.
No amount of Ruby on Rails, agile standups, or awesome design is going to help make that unique special connection between two people. I think if you're looking systematically for the love of your life, you're doing it…
Can you explain why you think there's no such thing as true referential transparency? I'd disagree with that statement, so I'm interested as to what you mean, and what your arguments are. Thanks.
"there are no vtable passed around nor attached to "objects" in Haskell" Err... what the fuck? That's exactly how they work. http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/OOP_vs_type_classes#Type_... Read about the 'dictionary'…
The two guys in the middle of that photo look like total brogrammers.
"I haven't read the article but..." So it's come to this on HN...
Well at least she's learnt something.
Just get her to restore from her most recent backup. She does have a backup, doesn't she? If she didn't bother to backup, she doesn't have much right to be upset.