If only their definition matters then their only purpose in this thread is to derail the conversation, or in other words railroad everyone else out because only they can be right. People responding reject that, because…
> Go on, take that theory just the tiniest little step further logically. So you take that step, is that illegal immigrant a citizen now because they killed someone?
> If every potential mate and employer was able to review everything you've ever posted online, we'd all be much more careful with what we say, much better able to screen out bad actors, and the wold would be a better…
You can ask dang specifically or another moderator to prove if you are being trafficked down to irrelevancy by bots. I'm very certain you're wrong either way.
Amazon, NSA, apparently a few other 3 letter agencies around the world, but the lattermost probably did not expect access to their agencies would be limited but appreciate that they aren't going to be exposed as…
Can attest to this. The door going into the secure area is the most secure part of a SCIF and always has been. Some companies do the LAN inside the SCIF a bit better than others, but generally its not significantly any…
> As you helpfully noted in your second half of your comment, high wealth, deliberately low income[0] means they are not in the top tax bracket[1] on the basis of their carefully calculated, tax-optimized income. There…
This reads like a tired response not even engaging with the point. What amount of detail would relay to you "human energy"? You don't even engage with the original argument, you skip past it and claim "we all,…
Hey, if it's irrelevant noise then why are you crying about it? Anyway, to make it the UK's problem even more, I will be doing what I can to eliminate the UK's traffic to as many services as possible. I have no interest…
"we all" is wrong, always. You do not agree with me. You can't claim to have my interests or my will if you are against it.
We also know that this premise is simply wrong, Census is statistical survey, no party in the world is legally allowed to inspect the contents of the individual form via Title 13. Counting illegals is not possible under…
Counting illegals on a poorly defined framework of which is largely self attestation?
> On the other hand, it's already now hard to find people for almost any kind of work. Why is it hard? Can't find a pick from the ~3% unemployment rate? That's approx 100-200k people, are you sure you can't find a…
> In failed states, sure. If you're describing the US as a failed state then we have nothing to talk about. Notwithstanding the fact the essence of the state at question even being relevant. Enjoy your day.
> It’s not meant to be a means of legal recourse, it’s a last resort. Guns are a first line defense for millions of people. A lawyer with a briefcase and a judge wearing a gaudy robe+wig is not a defense at all. Though…
Bad actors like -- William Tong, Anne E. Lopez, Dave Yost, Jonathan Skrmetti, Gwen Tauiliili-Langkilde, Kris Mayes, Tim Griffin, Rob Bonta, Phil Weiser, Kathleen Jennings, Brian Schwalb, Christopher M. Carr, Kwame…
What kind of things would you like to hear? The default is you hear nothing. Most black boxes work this way. And you similarly have no say in the matter.
GP is saying that the LLM of choice is not necessarily able to translate the jargon, or establishes itself to be an expert at the concept(s) to employ the jargon compatible with the user.
This is a reaction to reputation, which is sometimes reasonable. But reasonable people also confirm their suspicions with evidence regardless of the situation. Go ahead and save your time, but remember your reputation…
> Pretty predictable what happens when you deny coverage for a treatment someone needs Other poster demonstrated that you have no idea what "need" is. So you also have no idea what a "shortcoming of the present system"…
Where the hell did you read that
OK so its much a shallower thought than I anticipated. Why go through the "prediction market" at all then? The hitman still killed someone, payments are not anonymous in this market, and its certainly not clean.…
Why would the opposing side of that exact same bet allow themselves to be fleeced of all that money for free?
There's a number of people who try and influence elections, money is not nearly as effective as you think it is. Or else a few people that have a few billion in their coffers would run and have won elections in places…
I look forward to the Great Australian firewall, maybe they can contain themselves without infecting the rest of the world.
If only their definition matters then their only purpose in this thread is to derail the conversation, or in other words railroad everyone else out because only they can be right. People responding reject that, because…
> Go on, take that theory just the tiniest little step further logically. So you take that step, is that illegal immigrant a citizen now because they killed someone?
> If every potential mate and employer was able to review everything you've ever posted online, we'd all be much more careful with what we say, much better able to screen out bad actors, and the wold would be a better…
You can ask dang specifically or another moderator to prove if you are being trafficked down to irrelevancy by bots. I'm very certain you're wrong either way.
Amazon, NSA, apparently a few other 3 letter agencies around the world, but the lattermost probably did not expect access to their agencies would be limited but appreciate that they aren't going to be exposed as…
Can attest to this. The door going into the secure area is the most secure part of a SCIF and always has been. Some companies do the LAN inside the SCIF a bit better than others, but generally its not significantly any…
> As you helpfully noted in your second half of your comment, high wealth, deliberately low income[0] means they are not in the top tax bracket[1] on the basis of their carefully calculated, tax-optimized income. There…
This reads like a tired response not even engaging with the point. What amount of detail would relay to you "human energy"? You don't even engage with the original argument, you skip past it and claim "we all,…
Hey, if it's irrelevant noise then why are you crying about it? Anyway, to make it the UK's problem even more, I will be doing what I can to eliminate the UK's traffic to as many services as possible. I have no interest…
"we all" is wrong, always. You do not agree with me. You can't claim to have my interests or my will if you are against it.
We also know that this premise is simply wrong, Census is statistical survey, no party in the world is legally allowed to inspect the contents of the individual form via Title 13. Counting illegals is not possible under…
Counting illegals on a poorly defined framework of which is largely self attestation?
> On the other hand, it's already now hard to find people for almost any kind of work. Why is it hard? Can't find a pick from the ~3% unemployment rate? That's approx 100-200k people, are you sure you can't find a…
> In failed states, sure. If you're describing the US as a failed state then we have nothing to talk about. Notwithstanding the fact the essence of the state at question even being relevant. Enjoy your day.
> It’s not meant to be a means of legal recourse, it’s a last resort. Guns are a first line defense for millions of people. A lawyer with a briefcase and a judge wearing a gaudy robe+wig is not a defense at all. Though…
Bad actors like -- William Tong, Anne E. Lopez, Dave Yost, Jonathan Skrmetti, Gwen Tauiliili-Langkilde, Kris Mayes, Tim Griffin, Rob Bonta, Phil Weiser, Kathleen Jennings, Brian Schwalb, Christopher M. Carr, Kwame…
What kind of things would you like to hear? The default is you hear nothing. Most black boxes work this way. And you similarly have no say in the matter.
GP is saying that the LLM of choice is not necessarily able to translate the jargon, or establishes itself to be an expert at the concept(s) to employ the jargon compatible with the user.
This is a reaction to reputation, which is sometimes reasonable. But reasonable people also confirm their suspicions with evidence regardless of the situation. Go ahead and save your time, but remember your reputation…
> Pretty predictable what happens when you deny coverage for a treatment someone needs Other poster demonstrated that you have no idea what "need" is. So you also have no idea what a "shortcoming of the present system"…
Where the hell did you read that
OK so its much a shallower thought than I anticipated. Why go through the "prediction market" at all then? The hitman still killed someone, payments are not anonymous in this market, and its certainly not clean.…
Why would the opposing side of that exact same bet allow themselves to be fleeced of all that money for free?
There's a number of people who try and influence elections, money is not nearly as effective as you think it is. Or else a few people that have a few billion in their coffers would run and have won elections in places…
I look forward to the Great Australian firewall, maybe they can contain themselves without infecting the rest of the world.