Yes, but the New York Times employs top-notch webdevs. See http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/ and http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2012/snow-fall/ So they have the skills, but maybe it's for other reasons they don't follow…
Import my tags and folders and you're good. The RSS feed isn't the problem - it's the hundreds of hours I've put into curating content.
There's a ton of product manager, designers, and researchers on Hacker News. But looking at his profile seems to indicate that Mr. Clarks a pretty humble guy.
I tried to go to an address about 2 miles from Cupertino - and Apple maps redirected me to the exact same address, except in the city next door.
Probably eventual Google Now support.
The first sentence in the article.
> the model of iOS UX. Are you sure? It's better, yes, but it's not a model of UX and on an iPad it seems not much thought was taken into making it a truly universal app. There's a lot of unused space and everything…
The Business Insider can be a bit on the sensationalist side. I don't want to say tabloid but they're around TechCrunch levels of overexaggeration.
Yes, but the New York Times employs top-notch webdevs. See http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/ and http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2012/snow-fall/ So they have the skills, but maybe it's for other reasons they don't follow…
Import my tags and folders and you're good. The RSS feed isn't the problem - it's the hundreds of hours I've put into curating content.
There's a ton of product manager, designers, and researchers on Hacker News. But looking at his profile seems to indicate that Mr. Clarks a pretty humble guy.
I tried to go to an address about 2 miles from Cupertino - and Apple maps redirected me to the exact same address, except in the city next door.
Probably eventual Google Now support.
The first sentence in the article.
> the model of iOS UX. Are you sure? It's better, yes, but it's not a model of UX and on an iPad it seems not much thought was taken into making it a truly universal app. There's a lot of unused space and everything…
The Business Insider can be a bit on the sensationalist side. I don't want to say tabloid but they're around TechCrunch levels of overexaggeration.