I recently worked on a site run on such a server. I've set up my own servers before, and I think it can be fun, but this time it was the other guy's. I have to say it was pretty annoying because the little things that…
>generate web sites for commercial art galleries (who didn't want web sites). Were you generating the sites in sort of a 3rd-party, no-connection way, or did they just want someone to create their sites for them?
I took E16, newly installed on my laptop, to a work presentation once. I was really excited to turn the thing on and see everyone's eyes bug out. But I plugged the projector in and it turned out there was some strange…
When you scale it down to letterhead size, it is no longer NEMA 6 compliant. :-(
I wasn't sure what the point of the article was. Reinforcing pricing notions of a specific group was my second guess, and from what you're saying, that's the right one.
$10000+ is the "domain of big-budget agencies"? What exact kind of work are we talking about here? Certainly not websites...that are any good... :) Maybe that's the problem I had with this post--no project parameters…
Sure it is a bit of an overpayment for a cheap logo. Like any bad logo though, it just sits there and waits for refinement. With all of the "X Corp got their now-famous logo" comments, what isn't mentioned is the way…
I recently worked on a site run on such a server. I've set up my own servers before, and I think it can be fun, but this time it was the other guy's. I have to say it was pretty annoying because the little things that…
>generate web sites for commercial art galleries (who didn't want web sites). Were you generating the sites in sort of a 3rd-party, no-connection way, or did they just want someone to create their sites for them?
I took E16, newly installed on my laptop, to a work presentation once. I was really excited to turn the thing on and see everyone's eyes bug out. But I plugged the projector in and it turned out there was some strange…
When you scale it down to letterhead size, it is no longer NEMA 6 compliant. :-(
I wasn't sure what the point of the article was. Reinforcing pricing notions of a specific group was my second guess, and from what you're saying, that's the right one.
$10000+ is the "domain of big-budget agencies"? What exact kind of work are we talking about here? Certainly not websites...that are any good... :) Maybe that's the problem I had with this post--no project parameters…
Sure it is a bit of an overpayment for a cheap logo. Like any bad logo though, it just sits there and waits for refinement. With all of the "X Corp got their now-famous logo" comments, what isn't mentioned is the way…