What I get from this is frontier model capabilities are being stagnant.
Look at their benchmark charts to understand how desperate they're. A lame duck now.
From my experience optimizing an OLAP database with high concurrency; lots of time the bottleneck is memory speed.
No backup, no replica? Such a shame.
I think the new UPDATE implementation is great, however its impact is limited. As a heavy CH user, our typical use case is inserting rows with some columns are missing, then backfill these columns later on (and I've…
First, I think the article provides false claim, the solution doesn't guarantee durability. Second, I believe good synchronous code is better than bad asynchronous code, and it's way easier to write good synchronous…
Yet another database built on ByteKV. Back then when I was in ByteDance, all infrastructure were more or less using ByteKV for data and metadata storage. Unfortunately we had less information about this technology…
I believe the author means "the best transactional k/v store"
What I get from this is frontier model capabilities are being stagnant.
Look at their benchmark charts to understand how desperate they're. A lame duck now.
From my experience optimizing an OLAP database with high concurrency; lots of time the bottleneck is memory speed.
No backup, no replica? Such a shame.
I think the new UPDATE implementation is great, however its impact is limited. As a heavy CH user, our typical use case is inserting rows with some columns are missing, then backfill these columns later on (and I've…
First, I think the article provides false claim, the solution doesn't guarantee durability. Second, I believe good synchronous code is better than bad asynchronous code, and it's way easier to write good synchronous…
Yet another database built on ByteKV. Back then when I was in ByteDance, all infrastructure were more or less using ByteKV for data and metadata storage. Unfortunately we had less information about this technology…
I believe the author means "the best transactional k/v store"