1 person billion dollar company - the new buzz phrase when "democratize" became so yesterday is in my opinion just that.
"Now the only reason why I won't post this as an arxiv note, is that the humans actually beat gpt-5 to the punch :-). Namely the arxiv paper has a v2 arxiv.org/pdf/2503.10138v2 with an additional author and they closed…
But I can complain about what happens to said something. If my blog photo becomes deep fake porn am I allowed to complain or not ? What we have is an entirely novel situation (with ai) worth at least a serious…
> a calculator to check her math homework Change 'check' to 'do' and we'll have a discussion.
There was a time when in the name of progress people were killed for whatever resources they possessed, others were enslaved etc. and I was under the impression that the measure of our civilization is that we actually…
> Sure, there will be growing pains, friction, etc. Who cares? That's right. Who cares about pains of others and why they even should are absolutely words to live by.
One of the biggest factors in risk of death right now is poverty. Also what is being chased right now is "human level on most economically viable tasks" because the automated research for solving physics etc. even now…
Apparently the biggest mistake they made is to criticize Trump for Jan 6. It's ok, they apologized for that.
Well I don't know. A bit naive, a bit like sci-fi and aimed at raising money fits my description of bs quite well.
So it's bs but for money and therefore totally fine ? I think it's not ok if only a fraction comes true because some people believe in those things and act on those beliefs right now.
I got 185 from 4o mini https://chatgpt.com/share/670987da-6e70-800b-b5a6-f8548fda6b...
> Yet in the face of this we still see a population of naysayers who appear intent on rubbishing LLMs at any cost. What was the cost in this case ? It's just an experiment and I think your reaction is way too emotional…
Those certainly were the catchy headlines. Here's an interesting article: https://news.mit.edu/2024/study-reveals-why-ai-analyzed-medi... “We found that even state-of-the-art models which are optimally performant in…
I actually agree with you. I was a bit sarcastic. If I understand correctly there isn't a fundamental difference when it comes to text output vs pixel data output in this context. If so then it suddenly sounds much more…
What ? Stable diffusion doesn't have an underlying understanding that humans typically have two arms, two hands and five fingers per hand gathered from vast sea of training data ? That's a bold statement.
With 3.6B people in the workforce I'd argue there isn't a billion people in need of a computer, not to mention an ai subscription plan. I'm of course assuming most subscriptions for ai are work related.
> I think what Suleyman is missing here is that most people aren't fine with their "TVs, laptops, in-car cameras and earbuds" recording everything continuously. I really hope so but I'm not so sure. I suspect most…
And yet this is precisely what people like Altman say about their product. That's pretty tiring.
I'm with you there. I'm just not holding my breath for the current state of law.
> It also voids plausibility for Fair Use exemptions. I can see large copyright holders lining up with takedowns I thought so for a moment but then again Meta, Anthropic (I just checked and they have a "for profit and…
I don't think that's a good example. People with Alzheimer's have, to put it simply, damaged memory, but not complete lack of. We're talking about a situation where a person wouldn't be even conscious of being a…
I wonder if those responses could already be influenced by the fact that the cutoff for some of the models out there was indeed 2023 and people wrote about it all over the internet.
Yes but this was just to make a blatant example. The questions still stands. If you feed a LLM certain kind of data is it possible it strays from it completely - like we sometimes do in cases big and small when we…
This is truly the new model's answer ? It's pretty similar to 3.5's "reasoning" actually: In this context, "3.10" and "3.11" should be interpreted as decimal numbers, not as numbers with more digits. When comparing: 3.9…
> which parts of intelligence do you think are not representable as conditional probability distributions Maybe I'm wrong here but a lot of our brilliance comes from acting against the statistical consensus. What I mean…
1 person billion dollar company - the new buzz phrase when "democratize" became so yesterday is in my opinion just that.
"Now the only reason why I won't post this as an arxiv note, is that the humans actually beat gpt-5 to the punch :-). Namely the arxiv paper has a v2 arxiv.org/pdf/2503.10138v2 with an additional author and they closed…
But I can complain about what happens to said something. If my blog photo becomes deep fake porn am I allowed to complain or not ? What we have is an entirely novel situation (with ai) worth at least a serious…
> a calculator to check her math homework Change 'check' to 'do' and we'll have a discussion.
There was a time when in the name of progress people were killed for whatever resources they possessed, others were enslaved etc. and I was under the impression that the measure of our civilization is that we actually…
> Sure, there will be growing pains, friction, etc. Who cares? That's right. Who cares about pains of others and why they even should are absolutely words to live by.
One of the biggest factors in risk of death right now is poverty. Also what is being chased right now is "human level on most economically viable tasks" because the automated research for solving physics etc. even now…
Apparently the biggest mistake they made is to criticize Trump for Jan 6. It's ok, they apologized for that.
Well I don't know. A bit naive, a bit like sci-fi and aimed at raising money fits my description of bs quite well.
So it's bs but for money and therefore totally fine ? I think it's not ok if only a fraction comes true because some people believe in those things and act on those beliefs right now.
I got 185 from 4o mini https://chatgpt.com/share/670987da-6e70-800b-b5a6-f8548fda6b...
> Yet in the face of this we still see a population of naysayers who appear intent on rubbishing LLMs at any cost. What was the cost in this case ? It's just an experiment and I think your reaction is way too emotional…
Those certainly were the catchy headlines. Here's an interesting article: https://news.mit.edu/2024/study-reveals-why-ai-analyzed-medi... “We found that even state-of-the-art models which are optimally performant in…
I actually agree with you. I was a bit sarcastic. If I understand correctly there isn't a fundamental difference when it comes to text output vs pixel data output in this context. If so then it suddenly sounds much more…
What ? Stable diffusion doesn't have an underlying understanding that humans typically have two arms, two hands and five fingers per hand gathered from vast sea of training data ? That's a bold statement.
With 3.6B people in the workforce I'd argue there isn't a billion people in need of a computer, not to mention an ai subscription plan. I'm of course assuming most subscriptions for ai are work related.
> I think what Suleyman is missing here is that most people aren't fine with their "TVs, laptops, in-car cameras and earbuds" recording everything continuously. I really hope so but I'm not so sure. I suspect most…
And yet this is precisely what people like Altman say about their product. That's pretty tiring.
I'm with you there. I'm just not holding my breath for the current state of law.
> It also voids plausibility for Fair Use exemptions. I can see large copyright holders lining up with takedowns I thought so for a moment but then again Meta, Anthropic (I just checked and they have a "for profit and…
I don't think that's a good example. People with Alzheimer's have, to put it simply, damaged memory, but not complete lack of. We're talking about a situation where a person wouldn't be even conscious of being a…
I wonder if those responses could already be influenced by the fact that the cutoff for some of the models out there was indeed 2023 and people wrote about it all over the internet.
Yes but this was just to make a blatant example. The questions still stands. If you feed a LLM certain kind of data is it possible it strays from it completely - like we sometimes do in cases big and small when we…
This is truly the new model's answer ? It's pretty similar to 3.5's "reasoning" actually: In this context, "3.10" and "3.11" should be interpreted as decimal numbers, not as numbers with more digits. When comparing: 3.9…
> which parts of intelligence do you think are not representable as conditional probability distributions Maybe I'm wrong here but a lot of our brilliance comes from acting against the statistical consensus. What I mean…