> My criteria were subjective but simple to understand: the language should introduce new concepts (as Principia Discordia puts it, ’tis an ill wind that blows no minds) [...] I wonder how many people share this…
The subheader claims that they have done this without reducing wages.
> With attempting to bestow a half-trillion-dollar benefit on people who attended – and often graduated from – college when a majority of Americans – and an overwhelming majority of voters who needed to be convinced…
Sounds like you indeed didn't read beyond the first line - this article argues that it is not scrum (etc.) which is horrible, but the context in which these systems are used.
> My criteria were subjective but simple to understand: the language should introduce new concepts (as Principia Discordia puts it, ’tis an ill wind that blows no minds) [...] I wonder how many people share this…
The subheader claims that they have done this without reducing wages.
> With attempting to bestow a half-trillion-dollar benefit on people who attended – and often graduated from – college when a majority of Americans – and an overwhelming majority of voters who needed to be convinced…
Sounds like you indeed didn't read beyond the first line - this article argues that it is not scrum (etc.) which is horrible, but the context in which these systems are used.