IANAL, but yes, I'd assume the license is unenforceable on the AI content.
No, an AI's output can still violate copyright.
LLMs are indeed very special compared to past efforts at automated theorem proving. The search tree for proofs is enormous, even short textbook exercises (i.e. a few dozen lines of Lean) were difficult with GOFAI…
There was recently an announcement that a group trying to formalize it found a gap exactly where other mathematicians were pointing. So to the extent there was any doubt, it should be gone now--the proof was incorrect.…
I believe that "single source of truth" is a principle that should always be followed. If there's duplicated code where it'd be a bug if they diverge, then you should refactor. It creates a long-distance coupling in…
One of the authors said in a reddit comment (and I hope I am summarizing accurately) that it's impossible to show a diagram as the smallest instance of the technique gives like 10^1000000 points.
The problem was pretty well known, and had many human attempts. There's some room to argue that the right humans hadn't attempted it, as the solution used advanced methods from another field of math. But imho, whereas…
This is happening to other forms of competitive programming too. The most recent AIs have problem solving skills rivaling top humans, and so if AI can't be easily banned, the competition is dominated by AI agents. I…
You can't do this for general functions, but it's fine to do in cases where the definition of f naturally embeds into the rationals. For example, a polynomial over Z is also a polynomial over Q or C.
The movement from R to C can be done rigorously. It gets hand-waved away in more application-oriented math courses, but it's done properly in higher level theoretically-focused courses. Lifting from a smaller field (or…
You can go farther and say that you can't even construct real numbers without strong enough axioms. Theories of first order arithmetic, like Peano arithmetic, can talk about computable reals but not reals in general.
IANAL, but yes, I'd assume the license is unenforceable on the AI content.
No, an AI's output can still violate copyright.
LLMs are indeed very special compared to past efforts at automated theorem proving. The search tree for proofs is enormous, even short textbook exercises (i.e. a few dozen lines of Lean) were difficult with GOFAI…
There was recently an announcement that a group trying to formalize it found a gap exactly where other mathematicians were pointing. So to the extent there was any doubt, it should be gone now--the proof was incorrect.…
I believe that "single source of truth" is a principle that should always be followed. If there's duplicated code where it'd be a bug if they diverge, then you should refactor. It creates a long-distance coupling in…
One of the authors said in a reddit comment (and I hope I am summarizing accurately) that it's impossible to show a diagram as the smallest instance of the technique gives like 10^1000000 points.
The problem was pretty well known, and had many human attempts. There's some room to argue that the right humans hadn't attempted it, as the solution used advanced methods from another field of math. But imho, whereas…
This is happening to other forms of competitive programming too. The most recent AIs have problem solving skills rivaling top humans, and so if AI can't be easily banned, the competition is dominated by AI agents. I…
You can't do this for general functions, but it's fine to do in cases where the definition of f naturally embeds into the rationals. For example, a polynomial over Z is also a polynomial over Q or C.
The movement from R to C can be done rigorously. It gets hand-waved away in more application-oriented math courses, but it's done properly in higher level theoretically-focused courses. Lifting from a smaller field (or…
You can go farther and say that you can't even construct real numbers without strong enough axioms. Theories of first order arithmetic, like Peano arithmetic, can talk about computable reals but not reals in general.