Not just on Windows. Modern web pages are full of cookie banners, sign-up-for-newsletter banners and please-sign-in-with-facebook banners. It's become a sport to ignore what's in popups and quickly find the right place…
> Most non-technical people I know wouldn't have a clue what a .zip was. Most non-technical people in the 40+ age range that I know are well aware what .zip was and still is. Please don't consider your circle of peers…
The FEDs rate was close to 0% early 2022 and is now above 5%. Yes, something very substantial has changed.
Or you could take personal responsibility for having ignored everybody who said for years that it's all BS. This was not a secret, unforeseen, some higher natural power. It was delusion, and if you choose not to listen…
> if it looks too good to true, it probably is. And everybody told you, all the time, and you chose not to listen. That's your choice, no worries. But threatening physical harm to the con man you fell for is just not ok.
And yet the top comment here starts with: > I sincerely hope that I never meet Sam Bankman Fried, because if I did I do not know what I would do but it certainly wouldn't be legal. Why is this statement not condemned?…
Not just on Windows. Modern web pages are full of cookie banners, sign-up-for-newsletter banners and please-sign-in-with-facebook banners. It's become a sport to ignore what's in popups and quickly find the right place…
> Most non-technical people I know wouldn't have a clue what a .zip was. Most non-technical people in the 40+ age range that I know are well aware what .zip was and still is. Please don't consider your circle of peers…
The FEDs rate was close to 0% early 2022 and is now above 5%. Yes, something very substantial has changed.
Or you could take personal responsibility for having ignored everybody who said for years that it's all BS. This was not a secret, unforeseen, some higher natural power. It was delusion, and if you choose not to listen…
> if it looks too good to true, it probably is. And everybody told you, all the time, and you chose not to listen. That's your choice, no worries. But threatening physical harm to the con man you fell for is just not ok.
And yet the top comment here starts with: > I sincerely hope that I never meet Sam Bankman Fried, because if I did I do not know what I would do but it certainly wouldn't be legal. Why is this statement not condemned?…