Which is exactly my point. The ACLU deals in protection of civil liberties of which in this case it is clear no rights were violated. So the ACLU has just become an advocate for liberal politics, which is precisely my…
What procedural guarantees are permanent residents guaranteed under US law, that these people were not granted when they were denied entry, ie. what is 'due process' in the context of entry for permanent residents?
Both articles just say "unconstitutional" and say "racist" a bunch of times without citing statute or case law. Sorry if I don't find such arguments compelling.
The left only started pretending like the world was ending in the past few weeks...
Who's rights? You think it is a "right" for foreign nationals to enter the United States?
What civil liberties? You think it is a civil liberty that foreign nationals may enter the United States?
9/11 was 16 years ago. Threats change. US domestic security has changed, and so has Saudi Arabia's. There is no reason to believe they are a current threat.
Excellent post
More like: "Oh no, an organization that casts advocacy for their leftist politics as defense of people's liberties is making me feel uncomfortable!" Opposing a border wall defends no one's civil liberties.
The problem is one can label anything nativism/xenophobia or authoritarianism regardless if that thing objectively fits the criteria of either label.
52% of the budget goes to entitlements. 16% goes to defense. That chart you posted is simply not correct. I think they confused discretionary spending with total spending.…
Then separate out the problem kids, not the slow kids.
Which is exactly my point. The ACLU deals in protection of civil liberties of which in this case it is clear no rights were violated. So the ACLU has just become an advocate for liberal politics, which is precisely my…
What procedural guarantees are permanent residents guaranteed under US law, that these people were not granted when they were denied entry, ie. what is 'due process' in the context of entry for permanent residents?
Both articles just say "unconstitutional" and say "racist" a bunch of times without citing statute or case law. Sorry if I don't find such arguments compelling.
The left only started pretending like the world was ending in the past few weeks...
Who's rights? You think it is a "right" for foreign nationals to enter the United States?
What civil liberties? You think it is a civil liberty that foreign nationals may enter the United States?
9/11 was 16 years ago. Threats change. US domestic security has changed, and so has Saudi Arabia's. There is no reason to believe they are a current threat.
Excellent post
More like: "Oh no, an organization that casts advocacy for their leftist politics as defense of people's liberties is making me feel uncomfortable!" Opposing a border wall defends no one's civil liberties.
The problem is one can label anything nativism/xenophobia or authoritarianism regardless if that thing objectively fits the criteria of either label.
52% of the budget goes to entitlements. 16% goes to defense. That chart you posted is simply not correct. I think they confused discretionary spending with total spending.…
Then separate out the problem kids, not the slow kids.