[dead]
I don't have a "favorite" language. I see languages and communities having strengths and weakness..I evaluate languages as being suitable or unsuitable for certain job.. If a language gets frequently get vulnerability…
> who uses php anymore? It gets used because people would rather say nice things like "PHP is alright" and "PHP has its place", than the hard truth. It is the political poster child for the software development domain.…
People ll continue to use it for fear of hurt feelings...
>It has its role... Of being a hole...
And can't do all of mathematics without 3...(just map all the numbers > 1 to points inside the interval 0-1)?
Oh, do you think Rust code bases won't be checked using LLMs?
Yes, I spoke a bit loosly..
And that my friend, is the problem with the rust community...
Who gives a fuck.
Survive..and how to be happy with less.
It is not. Tell me one good reason to deal with the horrible language called rust now that we have mechanisms capable of doing the exact same stuff in a vastly less obnoxious manner....(I am talking about running LLMs…
The point of writing in C is that I don't have to deal with borrow checker shit when it is too dumb to figure out what I want to do is actually safe.
Rust is not very relevant anymore when you can write it in C and once in a while run an LLM over it to catch any memory issues...
That is what I am not sure about...It is like, is having a public key closer to hacking the account than not having it? Theoretically, it is, but practically, it is not...
Yes, and to see the faults, there is no telling how much deep the simulation needs to be closer to the physical world. May in real life the thing would not work because of some signal EM interference. Then the…
I am wondering how much stuff (in terms of malicious behavior) one can hide in the (open) weights?
The best way to secure elections is to have a system where winners have to give up worldly pleasures, ties and all privacy to rule. It works great for the military and for the clergy where it is even worse. I don't know…
> if they cause the host computer to malfunction. It could, and that is the point running simulations. right?
It seems that in java you could write `ArrayList<A>`. I think this type is actually of kind "type -> type". But in java it seems that we cannot have the type `A<B>`, and functors and monads require that..
Interesting! Can you expand your flow chart to show the accepted way (according to you) to end up having sex?
Yep!
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
I don't have a "favorite" language. I see languages and communities having strengths and weakness..I evaluate languages as being suitable or unsuitable for certain job.. If a language gets frequently get vulnerability…
> who uses php anymore? It gets used because people would rather say nice things like "PHP is alright" and "PHP has its place", than the hard truth. It is the political poster child for the software development domain.…
People ll continue to use it for fear of hurt feelings...
>It has its role... Of being a hole...
And can't do all of mathematics without 3...(just map all the numbers > 1 to points inside the interval 0-1)?
Oh, do you think Rust code bases won't be checked using LLMs?
Yes, I spoke a bit loosly..
And that my friend, is the problem with the rust community...
Who gives a fuck.
Survive..and how to be happy with less.
It is not. Tell me one good reason to deal with the horrible language called rust now that we have mechanisms capable of doing the exact same stuff in a vastly less obnoxious manner....(I am talking about running LLMs…
The point of writing in C is that I don't have to deal with borrow checker shit when it is too dumb to figure out what I want to do is actually safe.
Rust is not very relevant anymore when you can write it in C and once in a while run an LLM over it to catch any memory issues...
That is what I am not sure about...It is like, is having a public key closer to hacking the account than not having it? Theoretically, it is, but practically, it is not...
Yes, and to see the faults, there is no telling how much deep the simulation needs to be closer to the physical world. May in real life the thing would not work because of some signal EM interference. Then the…
I am wondering how much stuff (in terms of malicious behavior) one can hide in the (open) weights?
The best way to secure elections is to have a system where winners have to give up worldly pleasures, ties and all privacy to rule. It works great for the military and for the clergy where it is even worse. I don't know…
> if they cause the host computer to malfunction. It could, and that is the point running simulations. right?
It seems that in java you could write `ArrayList<A>`. I think this type is actually of kind "type -> type". But in java it seems that we cannot have the type `A<B>`, and functors and monads require that..
Interesting! Can you expand your flow chart to show the accepted way (according to you) to end up having sex?
Yep!