Agreed, by mediocre I meant "ordinary." My original question being, if it's basically the same as other solutions, why would anyone use it now that we know what Twitter is doing with it.
If you consider Crashlytics to be a valuable service that is a step above others, I'm curious to know why you sold it as a data spy play to Twitter? Doesn't that kind of compromise the integrity of your vision? Or was…
I don't understand why anyone would use this now. It was one thing when Google bought Urchin, which was already incredibly pervasive. But Crashlytics is a relatively mediocre solution that doesn't already have market…
Agreed, by mediocre I meant "ordinary." My original question being, if it's basically the same as other solutions, why would anyone use it now that we know what Twitter is doing with it.
If you consider Crashlytics to be a valuable service that is a step above others, I'm curious to know why you sold it as a data spy play to Twitter? Doesn't that kind of compromise the integrity of your vision? Or was…
I don't understand why anyone would use this now. It was one thing when Google bought Urchin, which was already incredibly pervasive. But Crashlytics is a relatively mediocre solution that doesn't already have market…