He didn't recuse himself when he investigated his friend/donor and fired whistleblowers. Why would he now?
> There was no politics, no opinions, no ethics involved. It really is a science. Except that there are humans involved. How do you boil arbitrary human action down to a HARD science?
He didn't recuse himself when he investigated his friend/donor and fired whistleblowers. Why would he now?
> There was no politics, no opinions, no ethics involved. It really is a science. Except that there are humans involved. How do you boil arbitrary human action down to a HARD science?