It's to make sure "supporters" are actual supporters who put their money where their mouth is.
The only way this wouldn't happen is if the corporate side of the publication is fully in sync (or in control) with the editorial side. I consider the fact that the point of view put forth by the article was not…
It's to make sure "supporters" are actual supporters who put their money where their mouth is.
The only way this wouldn't happen is if the corporate side of the publication is fully in sync (or in control) with the editorial side. I consider the fact that the point of view put forth by the article was not…