>Ah, but are we paranoid or in possession of multiple personalities? Maybe for the former, the latter is true without a doubt.
Ah, but are we paranoid or in possession of multiple personalities? Then again, the risk of a court is never really a risk. This is perfectly legal. :P
> They also host fund raisers and that while there are some expensive ones, there are also cheap ones (like $25 or $50 a "plate") since every dollar counts in a war chest. For a household making above the median, this…
I agree with them. Whoever they happen to be!
Upon further reflection, maybe I should just keep using it. Demonstrating that multiple people could have access to the account makes an excellent case for plausible deniability. In the right circumstances a court could…
> In a meta sense I'm curious why you had to create a new account just to post this Events led me to conclude that using the same account consistently was a bad idea from an employment standpoint. It has nothing to do…
That seems to be the opinion espoused in the article. It was legal due to a "loophole". > I guess that makes sense if the reason the FBI didn't have probably cause was because they should have known that, even if…
http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/215714/employee+rights+... They've already "clarified" and "closed" that loophole. Next time, the programmer actually would go to jail.
>Ah, but are we paranoid or in possession of multiple personalities? Maybe for the former, the latter is true without a doubt.
Ah, but are we paranoid or in possession of multiple personalities? Then again, the risk of a court is never really a risk. This is perfectly legal. :P
> They also host fund raisers and that while there are some expensive ones, there are also cheap ones (like $25 or $50 a "plate") since every dollar counts in a war chest. For a household making above the median, this…
I agree with them. Whoever they happen to be!
Upon further reflection, maybe I should just keep using it. Demonstrating that multiple people could have access to the account makes an excellent case for plausible deniability. In the right circumstances a court could…
> In a meta sense I'm curious why you had to create a new account just to post this Events led me to conclude that using the same account consistently was a bad idea from an employment standpoint. It has nothing to do…
That seems to be the opinion espoused in the article. It was legal due to a "loophole". > I guess that makes sense if the reason the FBI didn't have probably cause was because they should have known that, even if…
http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/x/215714/employee+rights+... They've already "clarified" and "closed" that loophole. Next time, the programmer actually would go to jail.