> zero sum re-allocation games for which intermediaries get a cut If intermediaries get a cut, wouldn't that make the games negative-sum?
Mirrors flip things front-to-back
Would you mind expanding on this with an example? I'm trying to improve performance of my bash logging
> This is what ETFs do ETFs aren't necessarily index funds https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2014/01/16/etf-does-n...
Also, Chesterton's Fence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
Instead of s3fs, what's wrong with using the aws s3 cli? That's what we do for our clients' SFTP servers
> zero sum re-allocation games for which intermediaries get a cut If intermediaries get a cut, wouldn't that make the games negative-sum?
Mirrors flip things front-to-back
Would you mind expanding on this with an example? I'm trying to improve performance of my bash logging
> This is what ETFs do ETFs aren't necessarily index funds https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2014/01/16/etf-does-n...
Also, Chesterton's Fence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
Instead of s3fs, what's wrong with using the aws s3 cli? That's what we do for our clients' SFTP servers