What makes you think censorship ceases to be censorship when it is automated?
>What I'm saying is that there's no conclusive proof there's some sort of grand conspiracy at work here. Could you define what you mean by "grand conspiracy"? And what conclusive proof of it would look like?
>Perhaps these are the death throes of a dying propaganda machine? This is my thought as well. Its funny how quickly we've gone from people trying to redefine censorship, i.e.: "it's not censorship if a corporation does…
Guilty until proven innocent is an incompatible maxim for civilised society.
What makes you think censorship ceases to be censorship when it is automated?
>What I'm saying is that there's no conclusive proof there's some sort of grand conspiracy at work here. Could you define what you mean by "grand conspiracy"? And what conclusive proof of it would look like?
>Perhaps these are the death throes of a dying propaganda machine? This is my thought as well. Its funny how quickly we've gone from people trying to redefine censorship, i.e.: "it's not censorship if a corporation does…
Guilty until proven innocent is an incompatible maxim for civilised society.