Where is that written..? Not on the S-1 from what I see.
I read this as "let's address our shareholders' concerns with something that will increase shareholder value" mixed with "there's no such thing as 100% secure". If such hardware were to work... It should almost…
Seems more like AI-in-the-loop more than AI-native. I feel like this post didn't teach me anything I didn't already know or have an intuition about.
Why do you need to review design decisions with a team anymore? I get the impression that Fable, when well directed, is better than maybe 80% of SWEs. Maybe more. [edit: Yes, I'm maybe baiting other users, but I want to…
I think we definitely need to have alignment, and documentation to support it. I think this can be at the PRD level, mostly. For many systems, I'd argue technical documentation to understand how the internals are…
Can you summarize your thoughts into a single prompt that, with the context of the codebase, gets expanded to something that makes sense?
For an entire project? Yes I agree. For a feature or a submodule? I think when you work with claude to develop a plan, it's generally pretty good. I guess my question stems from being rigid how a design doc should be…
I think in the age of AI coding, these rationales are a bit outdated. And if you think they're not - I'm curious to know why you think so.
Top 2 comments fail to acknowledge the elephant in the room. It's not about the tech. We have a corrupt administration gatekeeping two powerful models for companies set to go public soon. I bet the models are powerful.…
How we learn has gotta change...
Imperfect example, but nuclear. We regulate that. Sure the US and other nuclear powers build it, and we have side effects of mutually assured destruction to keep us at bay, and other countries off the table. Maybe this…
Capitol Reef is ridiculous. There's no fish.
I don't think they are, I think they're not talking about that... "It's all about the spec."
Fits with the origin story of Claude Code...
Setting the plot for Angels and Demons... :D Mirror: https://archive.ph/JkeMp
Drugs.
yet another roll your own ROS...
^ Big this. If we take a pessimistic attitude, we're done for.
I wonder if the new models consider land use change and emissions from aggressive datacenter development and model training...
++ When an EU outlet says, "Given the annual savings, this sum will pay for itself in less than a year. In the past, the state transferred millions to the US company Microsoft, primarily for the use of office software…
Too big to fail?
Finally, don't have to remember the UMRN for Camptown Races anymore.
> “give people mental health breaks.” try going outside
I wonder how these pieces of understanding can be applied to neuroscience.
Maybe I'll vibecode that this weekend...
Where is that written..? Not on the S-1 from what I see.
I read this as "let's address our shareholders' concerns with something that will increase shareholder value" mixed with "there's no such thing as 100% secure". If such hardware were to work... It should almost…
Seems more like AI-in-the-loop more than AI-native. I feel like this post didn't teach me anything I didn't already know or have an intuition about.
Why do you need to review design decisions with a team anymore? I get the impression that Fable, when well directed, is better than maybe 80% of SWEs. Maybe more. [edit: Yes, I'm maybe baiting other users, but I want to…
I think we definitely need to have alignment, and documentation to support it. I think this can be at the PRD level, mostly. For many systems, I'd argue technical documentation to understand how the internals are…
Can you summarize your thoughts into a single prompt that, with the context of the codebase, gets expanded to something that makes sense?
For an entire project? Yes I agree. For a feature or a submodule? I think when you work with claude to develop a plan, it's generally pretty good. I guess my question stems from being rigid how a design doc should be…
I think in the age of AI coding, these rationales are a bit outdated. And if you think they're not - I'm curious to know why you think so.
Top 2 comments fail to acknowledge the elephant in the room. It's not about the tech. We have a corrupt administration gatekeeping two powerful models for companies set to go public soon. I bet the models are powerful.…
How we learn has gotta change...
Imperfect example, but nuclear. We regulate that. Sure the US and other nuclear powers build it, and we have side effects of mutually assured destruction to keep us at bay, and other countries off the table. Maybe this…
Capitol Reef is ridiculous. There's no fish.
I don't think they are, I think they're not talking about that... "It's all about the spec."
Fits with the origin story of Claude Code...
Setting the plot for Angels and Demons... :D Mirror: https://archive.ph/JkeMp
Drugs.
yet another roll your own ROS...
^ Big this. If we take a pessimistic attitude, we're done for.
I wonder if the new models consider land use change and emissions from aggressive datacenter development and model training...
++ When an EU outlet says, "Given the annual savings, this sum will pay for itself in less than a year. In the past, the state transferred millions to the US company Microsoft, primarily for the use of office software…
Too big to fail?
Finally, don't have to remember the UMRN for Camptown Races anymore.
> “give people mental health breaks.” try going outside
I wonder how these pieces of understanding can be applied to neuroscience.
Maybe I'll vibecode that this weekend...