Heritability (i.e. narrow-sense heritability as typically used in most research articles) is not so clear-cut as to be split between nature and nurture. Even the GP is slightly incorrect when saying: > ...as opposed to…
But the frequentist answer is only different when the frequentist can't use common sense. If you use min(D) as the frequentist estimator, you would get a very different confidence interval, as it would have the form…
This one of many Bayesian vs. frequentist blog posts where the frequentist example is presented in such bad faith or is so wrong that it's impossible to take seriously. Why is the sample mean used for the frequentist CI…
Heritability (i.e. narrow-sense heritability as typically used in most research articles) is not so clear-cut as to be split between nature and nurture. Even the GP is slightly incorrect when saying: > ...as opposed to…
But the frequentist answer is only different when the frequentist can't use common sense. If you use min(D) as the frequentist estimator, you would get a very different confidence interval, as it would have the form…
This one of many Bayesian vs. frequentist blog posts where the frequentist example is presented in such bad faith or is so wrong that it's impossible to take seriously. Why is the sample mean used for the frequentist CI…