Anyone have pre-print/draft version link for this cite: Alessandro Lenci, Distributional models of word meaning, 2017 Doesn't appear to be release yet: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-linguis...
"Under the random selection of a tiny subset of less than 0.1 percent of the total population, the density of the social graph of the citizens is massively reduced, while the "terrorist" cluster remains strongly…
Twitter might be having troubles as a public company, but this article has very little to say about it that's insightful.
bass drum: 909 >>> 808 Not even close from techno perspective
"Please do not put solutions to exercises online as it is important for students to work out solutions for themselves rather than copy them from the internet" Why exactly? I've found that being able to walk through a…
Ah yes. Grand conclusions drawn from 20 data points. Economic science wins again.
I like the intent of this chart, but the Y-axis is a mess. Combining percent change from 2007 (as units for the y-axis) with roll-overs of actual numbers that contain data pre-2007 is very unintuitive.
Anyone have pre-print/draft version link for this cite: Alessandro Lenci, Distributional models of word meaning, 2017 Doesn't appear to be release yet: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-linguis...
"Under the random selection of a tiny subset of less than 0.1 percent of the total population, the density of the social graph of the citizens is massively reduced, while the "terrorist" cluster remains strongly…
Twitter might be having troubles as a public company, but this article has very little to say about it that's insightful.
bass drum: 909 >>> 808 Not even close from techno perspective
"Please do not put solutions to exercises online as it is important for students to work out solutions for themselves rather than copy them from the internet" Why exactly? I've found that being able to walk through a…
Ah yes. Grand conclusions drawn from 20 data points. Economic science wins again.
I like the intent of this chart, but the Y-axis is a mess. Combining percent change from 2007 (as units for the y-axis) with roll-overs of actual numbers that contain data pre-2007 is very unintuitive.