> The patch however sneakily removes the chance ... If they haven't tested on other processors, should they leave code in because it has a "chance" to work on something else? I think both sides of this question could be…
Gemstone provides a database. There are very large Smalltalk based applications that run using Gemstone as the backing database[1] . These applications are, for the most part, very large in-house applications that don't…
The first one that comes to mind is the scratch package[1]. The entire scratch language, as far as I know, runs on top of squeak [1] https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/trusty/scratch
> The patch however sneakily removes the chance ... If they haven't tested on other processors, should they leave code in because it has a "chance" to work on something else? I think both sides of this question could be…
Gemstone provides a database. There are very large Smalltalk based applications that run using Gemstone as the backing database[1] . These applications are, for the most part, very large in-house applications that don't…
The first one that comes to mind is the scratch package[1]. The entire scratch language, as far as I know, runs on top of squeak [1] https://packages.ubuntu.com/source/trusty/scratch