I'm not sure I'd agree with initial statement (and by this I literally mean - "I am not sure", its not a figure of speech). I agree with everything else you said, but the way I see it - when a paradigm cornerstone…
Whole OOP is "wrong". It was "right" up to about early 90ies, given the average application size and hardware. The moment CPU's started scaling with cores and CPU started running hundreds of instructions per memory…
I don't believe in a single word of this article. The authenticity from an author on a public blog that joined the same day when this giant article was posted on is equal the authenticity of anything that Clinton or…
what if?
Build a nethack/rogue clone. Works every time, for any language.
I'm not sure I'd agree with initial statement (and by this I literally mean - "I am not sure", its not a figure of speech). I agree with everything else you said, but the way I see it - when a paradigm cornerstone…
Whole OOP is "wrong". It was "right" up to about early 90ies, given the average application size and hardware. The moment CPU's started scaling with cores and CPU started running hundreds of instructions per memory…
I don't believe in a single word of this article. The authenticity from an author on a public blog that joined the same day when this giant article was posted on is equal the authenticity of anything that Clinton or…
what if?
Build a nethack/rogue clone. Works every time, for any language.