Nice! Thanks for taking the time to explain this :-)
Ahh, you're putting the entire UI in binds. That's a really clever way to handle the lifecycle of the listeners! bind is "stupid" in the way that it completely recalculates a cells value on any change of a cell it's…
Thanks for the explanation in the link. The problem that is described in the link is clearly solvable, however what I'm referring to is more fundamental. I'm not talking about nested binds, but just a simple bind such…
"z = bind -> x.get() + y.get()" seems nice, but when are the attached listeners removed again? Typically this is solved with weak listeners, but Javascript doesn't support weak references. I'm worried that this library…
Nice! Thanks for taking the time to explain this :-)
Ahh, you're putting the entire UI in binds. That's a really clever way to handle the lifecycle of the listeners! bind is "stupid" in the way that it completely recalculates a cells value on any change of a cell it's…
Thanks for the explanation in the link. The problem that is described in the link is clearly solvable, however what I'm referring to is more fundamental. I'm not talking about nested binds, but just a simple bind such…
"z = bind -> x.get() + y.get()" seems nice, but when are the attached listeners removed again? Typically this is solved with weak listeners, but Javascript doesn't support weak references. I'm worried that this library…