I think there is an error in their SPF configuration. "v=spf1 ip4:67.212.170.242 -all" But verification connections come from a different address.
I'm surprised to see the opposition to self-signed certificates from the EFF. Pushing people towards centralized certificate authorities seems to be anti-freedom. Maybe there is a decentralized approach instead.
I think there is an error in their SPF configuration. "v=spf1 ip4:67.212.170.242 -all" But verification connections come from a different address.
I'm surprised to see the opposition to self-signed certificates from the EFF. Pushing people towards centralized certificate authorities seems to be anti-freedom. Maybe there is a decentralized approach instead.