The main issue is that "simplicity" is a very ambiguous thing. If your language is "simple", you need to write the same low-level code again and again every single time, making your own code NOT simple. Pushing all the…
that's a different practice though, just uses the same tool (visualization). The goal is not happiness/serenity/inner strength but powering up your memory.
does it feel different (better) than vivid daydreams?
I found out about this just recently, from an old new york times op-ed by anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann (https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/opinion/luhrmann-conjurin...). Basically it's a non-superstitious variant of…
The main issue is that "simplicity" is a very ambiguous thing. If your language is "simple", you need to write the same low-level code again and again every single time, making your own code NOT simple. Pushing all the…
that's a different practice though, just uses the same tool (visualization). The goal is not happiness/serenity/inner strength but powering up your memory.
does it feel different (better) than vivid daydreams?
I found out about this just recently, from an old new york times op-ed by anthropologist Tanya Luhrmann (https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/opinion/luhrmann-conjurin...). Basically it's a non-superstitious variant of…