If I hire an artist to draw something for me, I don't get to say that I drew it.
The salesperson comes in and says they've sold a big order of x units based on having a web portal that can set the temperature.
This just means that number 1 is also corrupt. OP is talking about the scale of none to complete corruption, not the relative rankings of all countries.
This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps the end of the beginning. -- Winston Churchill, 10 November 1942
Maybe a better word would be "corrupting". Lobbying causes people to act in a way that is contrary to what people expect at face value, since it changes the incentives: if we assume that politicians choose what is best…
That doesn't always work though, since citizens aren't given a vote on every policy issue[0]. Also, in the UK at the moment we have had a long stream of unelected governments, which make policy that isn't in the last…
Are we getting to the point where every API can be reverse engineered too? If so, that's not safe either.
Sure; but writing to an LLM is not "in private". That's the point of the original post.
> with Altman the only one worthy of the seat of power How does that make sense, if Altman is unable to control OpenAI's agents at the moment?
Don't leave it on a cliffhanger, what really happens?
Why is arr.filter().map() better than arr.reduce()? Doesn't arr.reduce() only loop once through the array?
I think the point is that once it becomes a crypto key, stock price, weather observation, whatever, the datum ceases to be random and becomes arbitrary.
Which business will hire a consultant who doesn't fully endorse the AI-everything religion?
Here's a thought experiment: consider the person that you disagree with the most (politically, religiously, socially, whatever). Would you want _that_ person to have an AI chatbot aligned to them and their views?
In fairness, a false positive is better than a false negative.
Presumably the big scary sysadmins have access to the *.cloudflare.com DNS records, and marketing just needs to push this thing right now and can't wait, so it's easier for them to buy a new domain with a shiny new TLD…
A similar thing happened in the Falkland's War: https://www.warhistoryonline.com/history/bbcs-treason-battle...
May I interest you in Jevon's paradox: if a thing becomes cheaper or more efficient, usage tends to go up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox
That is literally what Excel is for. Why didn't you use that first of all?
Schrödinger's basilisk?
50% of the population are below average intelligence.
Why would you look for sawdust? That's a waste product. You would motivate everyone to stop producing actual furniture, and just buy the biggest bits of wood to turn entirely into sawdust. Which is textbook Godhart's…
Why should a radiologist have to debunk AI slop? They have enough to do already. That's the same mentality that is frustrating open-source repositories with sloppy pull requests, and saying "here, sort this out for me".
I was going to say the same. Also, if you go to shops like Screwfix or Toolstation (in the UK), you have to give your postcode and name to them before they sell to you. I tried opting out once and they refused to sell…
Maybe it's like Formula 1: it's a purposefully-extreme goal, which drives new development and makes "lesser" goals feel more achievable.
If I hire an artist to draw something for me, I don't get to say that I drew it.
The salesperson comes in and says they've sold a big order of x units based on having a web portal that can set the temperature.
This just means that number 1 is also corrupt. OP is talking about the scale of none to complete corruption, not the relative rankings of all countries.
This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps the end of the beginning. -- Winston Churchill, 10 November 1942
Maybe a better word would be "corrupting". Lobbying causes people to act in a way that is contrary to what people expect at face value, since it changes the incentives: if we assume that politicians choose what is best…
That doesn't always work though, since citizens aren't given a vote on every policy issue[0]. Also, in the UK at the moment we have had a long stream of unelected governments, which make policy that isn't in the last…
Are we getting to the point where every API can be reverse engineered too? If so, that's not safe either.
Sure; but writing to an LLM is not "in private". That's the point of the original post.
> with Altman the only one worthy of the seat of power How does that make sense, if Altman is unable to control OpenAI's agents at the moment?
Don't leave it on a cliffhanger, what really happens?
Why is arr.filter().map() better than arr.reduce()? Doesn't arr.reduce() only loop once through the array?
I think the point is that once it becomes a crypto key, stock price, weather observation, whatever, the datum ceases to be random and becomes arbitrary.
Which business will hire a consultant who doesn't fully endorse the AI-everything religion?
Here's a thought experiment: consider the person that you disagree with the most (politically, religiously, socially, whatever). Would you want _that_ person to have an AI chatbot aligned to them and their views?
In fairness, a false positive is better than a false negative.
Presumably the big scary sysadmins have access to the *.cloudflare.com DNS records, and marketing just needs to push this thing right now and can't wait, so it's easier for them to buy a new domain with a shiny new TLD…
A similar thing happened in the Falkland's War: https://www.warhistoryonline.com/history/bbcs-treason-battle...
May I interest you in Jevon's paradox: if a thing becomes cheaper or more efficient, usage tends to go up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox
That is literally what Excel is for. Why didn't you use that first of all?
Schrödinger's basilisk?
50% of the population are below average intelligence.
Why would you look for sawdust? That's a waste product. You would motivate everyone to stop producing actual furniture, and just buy the biggest bits of wood to turn entirely into sawdust. Which is textbook Godhart's…
Why should a radiologist have to debunk AI slop? They have enough to do already. That's the same mentality that is frustrating open-source repositories with sloppy pull requests, and saying "here, sort this out for me".
I was going to say the same. Also, if you go to shops like Screwfix or Toolstation (in the UK), you have to give your postcode and name to them before they sell to you. I tried opting out once and they refused to sell…
Maybe it's like Formula 1: it's a purposefully-extreme goal, which drives new development and makes "lesser" goals feel more achievable.