I love how you say "When Google is legally permitted to..." because that basically excuses you from acknowledging all of the times when they don't notify you of requests for your records. As in, whenever they are not…
>How one goes from the idea that cryptography presents the opportunity for undefeatable privacy, anonymity, confidentiality, etc no matter how much the state is against it, to, voluntary use of Google is the death…
>> The point is, Google as a company opposes giving the data, it fights it tooth and nail. It doesn't fight it tooth and nail. The challenge to the use of National Security Letters is relatively recent…
I love how you say "When Google is legally permitted to..." because that basically excuses you from acknowledging all of the times when they don't notify you of requests for your records. As in, whenever they are not…
>How one goes from the idea that cryptography presents the opportunity for undefeatable privacy, anonymity, confidentiality, etc no matter how much the state is against it, to, voluntary use of Google is the death…
>> The point is, Google as a company opposes giving the data, it fights it tooth and nail. It doesn't fight it tooth and nail. The challenge to the use of National Security Letters is relatively recent…