I think that what is misleading is to say that what is not BTC is not bitcoin. Also misleading is to call the metanet or bottle "DNS in the blockchain" and to try to make a broken syllogism using a post by Satoshi,…
I understand the concern, however association is not necessarily truth. Let's say there are the following main bitcoins: BTC - Bitcoin Core - small blocks + Lightning BSV - Bitcoin SV - Bitcoin as originally proposed,…
opcode return data can be deleted by nodes at will, they will be as redundant as they are profitable to the storage provider.
I think that what is misleading is to say that what is not BTC is not bitcoin. Also misleading is to call the metanet or bottle "DNS in the blockchain" and to try to make a broken syllogism using a post by Satoshi,…
I understand the concern, however association is not necessarily truth. Let's say there are the following main bitcoins: BTC - Bitcoin Core - small blocks + Lightning BSV - Bitcoin SV - Bitcoin as originally proposed,…
opcode return data can be deleted by nodes at will, they will be as redundant as they are profitable to the storage provider.