'algorithmic peaking' in order to verify a message's spam flag isn't really in the same ballpark of the accusation thrown here.
Why is everyone treating this as if it's fact?! "nearly certain" doesn't cut it in terms of proof, the burden of which is on Arrington.
'algorithmic peaking' in order to verify a message's spam flag isn't really in the same ballpark of the accusation thrown here.
Why is everyone treating this as if it's fact?! "nearly certain" doesn't cut it in terms of proof, the burden of which is on Arrington.