> If you make a language GC by default with opt-in ownership, what does your standard library look like? I could see the opposite working out very well. Having a GC type you can box other types in.…
That is really cool. Would "Use types as data primitives" be a good way to describe Tyrade?
I wonder the same thing. I have not programed a DB but.. I would think the worst thing to program in a gc'd language would be the cache. So, if you write that layer of the database separately in a non-gc'd you would…
> If you make a language GC by default with opt-in ownership, what does your standard library look like? I could see the opposite working out very well. Having a GC type you can box other types in.…
That is really cool. Would "Use types as data primitives" be a good way to describe Tyrade?
I wonder the same thing. I have not programed a DB but.. I would think the worst thing to program in a gc'd language would be the cache. So, if you write that layer of the database separately in a non-gc'd you would…