I believe in (some) American universities, any non-grad student who teaches a class is called a professor.
Here is a diagram demonstrating what I think OP is trying to say for why it is r^2 in 3 dimensions: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Forces/isq.html In 2 dimensions it would be just ~r.
Many of the comments have pointed out this flaw in the argument. I will try to post my own summary of this flaw: The problem is that this case against quantum computing due to the sheer scale of the number of parameters…
You won't be able to find a countable union of sets of just one point which covers [0,1], so the third axiom you state is not violated. In fact, like the law says, if you take such a countable union, the measure of the…
I believe in (some) American universities, any non-grad student who teaches a class is called a professor.
Here is a diagram demonstrating what I think OP is trying to say for why it is r^2 in 3 dimensions: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Forces/isq.html In 2 dimensions it would be just ~r.
Many of the comments have pointed out this flaw in the argument. I will try to post my own summary of this flaw: The problem is that this case against quantum computing due to the sheer scale of the number of parameters…
You won't be able to find a countable union of sets of just one point which covers [0,1], so the third axiom you state is not violated. In fact, like the law says, if you take such a countable union, the measure of the…