> I am not a lawyer You don't say?
> How can they possibly be letting a freshly convicted felon talk like this? Because the conviction, much like the government's accusations and case, is bullshit.
Whether you believe in my innocence or not, the CFAA actually does have a line about "password trafficking," which was alleged by the government -- but not charged.
To be clear, federal authorities have already admitted altering chat log information in this case.
To be clear, people are not upset at the _actual_ or _likely_ sentence, they are upset at the _potential_ sentence. When reporters say "Keys faces," they are talking about the potential sentence I face (as put forth by…
> I am not a lawyer You don't say?
> How can they possibly be letting a freshly convicted felon talk like this? Because the conviction, much like the government's accusations and case, is bullshit.
Whether you believe in my innocence or not, the CFAA actually does have a line about "password trafficking," which was alleged by the government -- but not charged.
To be clear, federal authorities have already admitted altering chat log information in this case.
To be clear, people are not upset at the _actual_ or _likely_ sentence, they are upset at the _potential_ sentence. When reporters say "Keys faces," they are talking about the potential sentence I face (as put forth by…