Exactly. Not sure they understand how things work in Canada at all. If anything, average investors in Canada can more easily access investable assets compared to American counterparts. For instance, there is no pattern…
I definitely have no idea what "free market banking" is. Though, I think your statement is contradictory. Central banks control their money supply, and thus they are in direct control of the S in S&D. So I am not sure…
Great job! Really cool solution here. I agree with the other comment that tqdm is simpler for iterables. Maybe see if you can abstract some of your logic to provide a wrapper function like tqdm does.
Respectfully, I see this as an oversimplification. Though, I can definitely understand why someone would say this and I do agree to some extent. The thing is, I think there is a lot of subtlety in most implementations.…
I don't know much about the other solutions that people are mentioning in the comments, but I have to say... this looks elegant! Great job!
Yes, I can see how it may come across with a certain level of arrogance. Though I would say it's well intentioned based on the "mistakes" the author said he's made. It's been helpful to me for instance, to read about…
Exactly. Not sure they understand how things work in Canada at all. If anything, average investors in Canada can more easily access investable assets compared to American counterparts. For instance, there is no pattern…
I definitely have no idea what "free market banking" is. Though, I think your statement is contradictory. Central banks control their money supply, and thus they are in direct control of the S in S&D. So I am not sure…
Great job! Really cool solution here. I agree with the other comment that tqdm is simpler for iterables. Maybe see if you can abstract some of your logic to provide a wrapper function like tqdm does.
Respectfully, I see this as an oversimplification. Though, I can definitely understand why someone would say this and I do agree to some extent. The thing is, I think there is a lot of subtlety in most implementations.…
I don't know much about the other solutions that people are mentioning in the comments, but I have to say... this looks elegant! Great job!
Yes, I can see how it may come across with a certain level of arrogance. Though I would say it's well intentioned based on the "mistakes" the author said he's made. It's been helpful to me for instance, to read about…