Maybe. It's just that if CFS doesn't point to something real, then that non-real, non-specific thing, having an origin doesn't really make sense. But if it is actually real (and specific), as indicated by another…
I was always under the impression that CFS was a non-specfic set of symptoms; a kind of catch-all categorical bucket for an unknown condition. If that's true, then that post-viral infection origin seems misleading.
Maybe. It's just that if CFS doesn't point to something real, then that non-real, non-specific thing, having an origin doesn't really make sense. But if it is actually real (and specific), as indicated by another…
I was always under the impression that CFS was a non-specfic set of symptoms; a kind of catch-all categorical bucket for an unknown condition. If that's true, then that post-viral infection origin seems misleading.