> [...] in a dynamic language so that we have no type annotation. We're talking about type theory and you took the escape hatch. > Let's say I named the argument "pair_of_ints". Following your logic, [...] You spoke of…
> [...] in a dynamic language so that we have no type annotation. We're talking about type theory and you took the escape hatch. > Let's say I named the argument "pair_of_ints". Following your logic, [...] You spoke of…