I did not write anything about "singular they". I wrote against the legitimacy of those linked guidelines, which accidentally include "singular they". The poster I replied to stated (I remember) that some use of…
I believe they do. Practice must have a reasonable reference. People are free to contribute to the language - but with some competence.
Certainly. But I referred to the presented guidelines, collectively - not to "singular they". I wrote and intended that _those linked guidelines_ are "not universal".
Could you kindly share a few links that you deem most informative and reliable? Thank you
But it is in such case a strong confirmation about how people are losing conscience of language (not a good thing to sacrifice, in terms of priority - it is very related to thought pollution), and awareness in general,…
I did not write anything about "singular they". I wrote against the legitimacy of those linked guidelines, which accidentally include "singular they". The poster I replied to stated (I remember) that some use of…
I believe they do. Practice must have a reasonable reference. People are free to contribute to the language - but with some competence.
Certainly. But I referred to the presented guidelines, collectively - not to "singular they". I wrote and intended that _those linked guidelines_ are "not universal".
Could you kindly share a few links that you deem most informative and reliable? Thank you
But it is in such case a strong confirmation about how people are losing conscience of language (not a good thing to sacrifice, in terms of priority - it is very related to thought pollution), and awareness in general,…