> Hate to break it to you, but the OP's edited comment is far less harmful than yours. It has been significantly, damned near whole cloth, edited in several ways since I said something, so I'd ask a little consideration…
My answer to that question will come across snarky or "the medical profession appealing to authority," I'm afraid, because I'd like to see your remarks entirely removed as medically harmful. Your purpose is clear from…
I'm not misinterpreting your post. You diagnosed the author with Segawa's based on your experiences by pointing out you wouldn't be surprised if he "had something similar". He does not, with certainty. You're also…
Segawa's is completely irrelevant in this case and not supported by any symptoms the author reports in the original article. I have diagnosed Segawa's. It is quite irresponsible to wave people off of successful…
> Hate to break it to you, but the OP's edited comment is far less harmful than yours. It has been significantly, damned near whole cloth, edited in several ways since I said something, so I'd ask a little consideration…
My answer to that question will come across snarky or "the medical profession appealing to authority," I'm afraid, because I'd like to see your remarks entirely removed as medically harmful. Your purpose is clear from…
I'm not misinterpreting your post. You diagnosed the author with Segawa's based on your experiences by pointing out you wouldn't be surprised if he "had something similar". He does not, with certainty. You're also…
Segawa's is completely irrelevant in this case and not supported by any symptoms the author reports in the original article. I have diagnosed Segawa's. It is quite irresponsible to wave people off of successful…