Yes, this is a substantially more detailed article than the original tech review link - it actually details what the claimed deception is.
And so the gender gap in computing begins.
The page is only showing the first few sentences on my iPad, before the footer covers it up. :/
98% as arbitrary as the "us news" weightings
Actually, it looks like I misunderstood. "All April Fools' Day Jokes on the Web are Here (so they don't clutter HN)" was the top link when I opened HN today so I thought it was some official stance. It appears to just…
Considering these april fools jokes aren't supposed to be on the front page, this is forgivable
He is talking about the total creation time -- putting n distinct elements into the same hash bucket means traversing to the end n times for an overall o(n^2) time
Isn't it far more likely that the meeting was about jobs' health, and the least suspicious story to tell a business partner to avoid speculation would be to say it is a meeting about the next iPhone?
Yes, this is a substantially more detailed article than the original tech review link - it actually details what the claimed deception is.
And so the gender gap in computing begins.
The page is only showing the first few sentences on my iPad, before the footer covers it up. :/
98% as arbitrary as the "us news" weightings
Actually, it looks like I misunderstood. "All April Fools' Day Jokes on the Web are Here (so they don't clutter HN)" was the top link when I opened HN today so I thought it was some official stance. It appears to just…
Considering these april fools jokes aren't supposed to be on the front page, this is forgivable
He is talking about the total creation time -- putting n distinct elements into the same hash bucket means traversing to the end n times for an overall o(n^2) time
Isn't it far more likely that the meeting was about jobs' health, and the least suspicious story to tell a business partner to avoid speculation would be to say it is a meeting about the next iPhone?