some would call sugar a scandal, probably with valid reasoning too: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sugar-harvard-scandal-nutriti... And they both clearly involve outright deception. The difference is probably just not…
It depends on how innocent you think Nestle is. I can understand why someone would conclude that there is some "messing with the truthfulness" going on at Nestle. Both in the product design, and the marketing. It's why…
I can see a product designer make the case that if millions are dying, then the product is defective in some way. The rules are different in two different places, but I can see how someone thinks these two cases are…
the numbers are definitely worse. "millions" dead? that sounds pretty bad. Not sure how true that is. It certainly isn't clear. But the idea that a western corporation will do something like changing a product to save…
like any drug deal, you should test the product. not exactly a cultural difference here. this whole thing even sounds like dallas buyers club.
some would call sugar a scandal, probably with valid reasoning too: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sugar-harvard-scandal-nutriti... And they both clearly involve outright deception. The difference is probably just not…
It depends on how innocent you think Nestle is. I can understand why someone would conclude that there is some "messing with the truthfulness" going on at Nestle. Both in the product design, and the marketing. It's why…
I can see a product designer make the case that if millions are dying, then the product is defective in some way. The rules are different in two different places, but I can see how someone thinks these two cases are…
the numbers are definitely worse. "millions" dead? that sounds pretty bad. Not sure how true that is. It certainly isn't clear. But the idea that a western corporation will do something like changing a product to save…
like any drug deal, you should test the product. not exactly a cultural difference here. this whole thing even sounds like dallas buyers club.