> Just take their current flagship smartphone, double the thickness to fit a halfway-between-smartphone-and-full-frame sensor, an SD card slot, ability to export RAWs, and a compact zoom lens, and sell it for like…
The rent-a-gym, I guess the west solves that by having gym equipment in a park? An interesting solution to a busy city.
Since this has a range of 4km, it requires a controller. There is now way to get that distance without one.
So if everybody is out there murdering people, that makes you unethical?
No one is attacking json here.
> I'm a marathoner Ok, but listening to music is cheating.
Of course they do. There is only reward and no downside to doing that. They save a few seconds, and no one is giving out tickets for doing this.
It is clearly not an article, it is question someone posed. Here is the answer.
Like Youtube, which lost money every year until it was bought by Google. Or Instagram? Or a variety of others. You don't understand why people want to copy those models of growths and get those big payouts? Which part…
> Yet I observe on Twitter and other social media that these problems are considered equally important, sometimes people even treat them as equivalent. How are you even judging that?
The consumers should pay. Every piece of plastic should have a recycling cost, like they do in some states with bottles and cans.
> Ocean plastic is a problem, but comes almost entirely from intentional dumping Right, like microplastics from the tires whenever anyone drives anywhere?
> People still care about Disney’s animated movies from the 30s and even adults are nostalgic about the 90s X-men animated TV show and the original Star Wars from the 70s. Come one. Saying people is a cop out? Everyone,…
> After people binge through new shows, the big 4 will be the ones holding all the old content. Do most people really want that old content? Apart from a few shows, I say no.
> whose residents do have motor vehicles with full access to the city; they just happen to run on separate waterways. You think everyone in Venice has a boat? No.
They kill 40,000 people every single year in the USA, and injure or disable over 2 million more. And that is not including death from the pollution the cause. And this is just one reason they are the worst invention…
> They won't be dangerous, will run clean, be super convenient and unbelievably inexpensive to own and operate. Oh, they will not use tires? Which leave smalls bits of plastic everywhere they go that get washed into our…
They tried in Melbourne too. A few people stood up and fought to save them, like Robert Risson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Risson
You get that billions of people already live without a car. Millions in the USA alone.
Or, you know. Catch the bus. Or the tram, or the train, or the ferry. Or walk. Or run. Or ride. Or get on a scooter. Of roller blade. Or use a skateboard.
40,000 people are killed every single year in the USA due to cars. Over 2 million are injured or disabled. And that is direct deaths, not including deaths from pollution. That is the tip of the iceberg for problems with…
So you will consume less to? Another bonus.
Sure, if you compare 1 to 1. But you have 100s to 1 on any street. A 100 cars are lot more noisy and polluting than one bus. https://www.iwillride.org/what-200-people-look-like-driving-...
> If driving into Manhattan were not an option, I would expect demand for housing in Manhattan would go up[0]. Of course, housing in Manhattan is already incredibly expensive... Why? And we recover all that wasted space…
And, they are often the worst drivers in any city.
> Just take their current flagship smartphone, double the thickness to fit a halfway-between-smartphone-and-full-frame sensor, an SD card slot, ability to export RAWs, and a compact zoom lens, and sell it for like…
The rent-a-gym, I guess the west solves that by having gym equipment in a park? An interesting solution to a busy city.
Since this has a range of 4km, it requires a controller. There is now way to get that distance without one.
So if everybody is out there murdering people, that makes you unethical?
No one is attacking json here.
> I'm a marathoner Ok, but listening to music is cheating.
Of course they do. There is only reward and no downside to doing that. They save a few seconds, and no one is giving out tickets for doing this.
It is clearly not an article, it is question someone posed. Here is the answer.
Like Youtube, which lost money every year until it was bought by Google. Or Instagram? Or a variety of others. You don't understand why people want to copy those models of growths and get those big payouts? Which part…
> Yet I observe on Twitter and other social media that these problems are considered equally important, sometimes people even treat them as equivalent. How are you even judging that?
The consumers should pay. Every piece of plastic should have a recycling cost, like they do in some states with bottles and cans.
> Ocean plastic is a problem, but comes almost entirely from intentional dumping Right, like microplastics from the tires whenever anyone drives anywhere?
> People still care about Disney’s animated movies from the 30s and even adults are nostalgic about the 90s X-men animated TV show and the original Star Wars from the 70s. Come one. Saying people is a cop out? Everyone,…
> After people binge through new shows, the big 4 will be the ones holding all the old content. Do most people really want that old content? Apart from a few shows, I say no.
> whose residents do have motor vehicles with full access to the city; they just happen to run on separate waterways. You think everyone in Venice has a boat? No.
They kill 40,000 people every single year in the USA, and injure or disable over 2 million more. And that is not including death from the pollution the cause. And this is just one reason they are the worst invention…
> They won't be dangerous, will run clean, be super convenient and unbelievably inexpensive to own and operate. Oh, they will not use tires? Which leave smalls bits of plastic everywhere they go that get washed into our…
They tried in Melbourne too. A few people stood up and fought to save them, like Robert Risson. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Risson
You get that billions of people already live without a car. Millions in the USA alone.
Or, you know. Catch the bus. Or the tram, or the train, or the ferry. Or walk. Or run. Or ride. Or get on a scooter. Of roller blade. Or use a skateboard.
40,000 people are killed every single year in the USA due to cars. Over 2 million are injured or disabled. And that is direct deaths, not including deaths from pollution. That is the tip of the iceberg for problems with…
So you will consume less to? Another bonus.
Sure, if you compare 1 to 1. But you have 100s to 1 on any street. A 100 cars are lot more noisy and polluting than one bus. https://www.iwillride.org/what-200-people-look-like-driving-...
> If driving into Manhattan were not an option, I would expect demand for housing in Manhattan would go up[0]. Of course, housing in Manhattan is already incredibly expensive... Why? And we recover all that wasted space…
And, they are often the worst drivers in any city.