Deeply flawed paper for several reasons: * Small data set of 2 runs (!!) * Exaggerated claims (saying A1 beat 50% of testers, yet only 4/10 testers found LESS vulns than A1, and A1 had a nearly 50% false positive rate)…
There were also more loaves of bread sold than window machines in 2012Q3. Oh, sorry, I thought we were just comparing unrelated things to 'prove' Microsoft is in trouble...
Nope. No Digitizer. Thanks for playing.
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
I love that this title is so unbiased and doesn't at all blow the document out of proportion or make it appear more sinister than it actually is. Thank you for not misleading readers with your title in order to get…
Exactly the points I wanted to make. The article is vague at best and no statistical evidence is presented anywhere.
Deeply flawed paper for several reasons: * Small data set of 2 runs (!!) * Exaggerated claims (saying A1 beat 50% of testers, yet only 4/10 testers found LESS vulns than A1, and A1 had a nearly 50% false positive rate)…
There were also more loaves of bread sold than window machines in 2012Q3. Oh, sorry, I thought we were just comparing unrelated things to 'prove' Microsoft is in trouble...
Nope. No Digitizer. Thanks for playing.
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
I love that this title is so unbiased and doesn't at all blow the document out of proportion or make it appear more sinister than it actually is. Thank you for not misleading readers with your title in order to get…
Exactly the points I wanted to make. The article is vague at best and no statistical evidence is presented anywhere.