Engels famously compared Marx to Darwin in his eulogy. But Marx's problem was that he tried to predict too much into the future and was shown to be wrong in almost all of it - most notably the only communist revolutions…
You're cheating with the non-obvious bit. That's not at all what makes something science. Also the falsifiablility criterion is far too strict for much of biology and many others. Many if not most of the facts of botany…
Absolutely, you can think of a complex weather system or history as computationally irreducible - Wolfram is afterall just reconceptualising complexity with it. You have to walk through all the steps as they happened to…
Engels famously compared Marx to Darwin in his eulogy. But Marx's problem was that he tried to predict too much into the future and was shown to be wrong in almost all of it - most notably the only communist revolutions…
You're cheating with the non-obvious bit. That's not at all what makes something science. Also the falsifiablility criterion is far too strict for much of biology and many others. Many if not most of the facts of botany…
Absolutely, you can think of a complex weather system or history as computationally irreducible - Wolfram is afterall just reconceptualising complexity with it. You have to walk through all the steps as they happened to…