> Musk bought Twitter looking to build an “everything app,” Part of me thinks he knows he lying and is just trying to drum up money and the other part thinks he's one of the most delusional and uninformed people in tech.
It does as of EF Core 8 or 9. One of the challenges for their team I'm assuming is making sure the release notes also get copied to the actual documentation. This was one case where I thought the same thing and only…
What was the request? Also, Claude refuses political stuff in general, not just your specific beliefs.
> 1. They pretend SQL is standardized, and support a heavily reduced featureset for any given database as a result EF Core is provider-specific and also exposes provider-specific functionality. > 4. You end up not…
With the big exception of Entity Framework which relies on LINQ.
> I know only a few ORM's but it seems they end up just adding another layer of DTO objects that are entirely separate from the domain classes anyway. Entity Framework in particular has come a long way in this regard.…
So again, you can train people but not AI? That's literally what you've said and now moving the goal posts in a way that makes no difference to what you said being patently wrong. It's wild having to argue with people…
> Frankly, I'm sure if people wanted to sneak in an AI generated code by carefully reviewing it and making sure it's targeted and well tested But this is exactly the point I'm making. If the code is carefully reviewed,…
Saying you didn't use AI when you did, regardless of the end product, is lying. What definition of the word lie wouldn't cover that?
A social contract? You invented that out of thin air. They're a means to an end not some discussion on philosophy.
lol Human beings are famously not already trained.
So when you said "AI cant be trained" you didn't mean "AI cant be trained" you meant that you personally can't? lol.
> can be trained to make it good and also improves the community. AI can be trained. Also, AI can create code that improves the community. It's replies like this that leave me even more confused.
> A pull request is a social artifact whose value and meaning is dependent on its author; Says who? How can you say I'm categorically wrong when your entire point rests upon an opinion?
YES! "No AI" policies that are purely based on technical grounds make no sense to me. Bad PR's are bad PR's regardless of their source. Are we really in a situation where good code that solves a problem won't be merged…
> The problem is that a lot of AI contributions are lazily produced without review. That sounds like a contributor problem. Not an AI problem. I still don't understand a "no AI" policy whose only purpose is to weed out…
> If the models (and harnesses) keep getting better at the same pace for the foreseeable years, we are heading to a world where the profession is commoditized to the ground. There's this talk about Jevons Paradox but I…
lol what?
Not really. I'm a recovering addict, felon, and have depression (lucky me). And though there were times where I could work an entire weekend without stopping, it was always followed by 2-3 days of doing absolutely…
Recovered opiate addict and for me it was a mix of everything: Some advice I had gotten from NA meetings, finally doing something about the other mental health issues I was dealing with, and most importantly:…
Just having this discussion with someone about AI in healthcare and how issues are going to be handled. If a nurse does something incorrectly, they can lose their license. Ensuring that nurse will never be a nurse…
That's fair. I guess at that point I think adding a label to the repo as opposed to the commit would make more sense to me.
Slightly related: I was in an interview once where it was the CEO, lead dev, and lead designer and inevitable "What are your weaknesses?" question came up. I answered honestly, which was that not only am I really bad at…
Are you intentionally misreading my comments? I asked a simple question: What technical concerns could possibly exist if the code is good? I made it very clear I wasn't talking about personal, political, or ethical…
Obviously people have those concerns. The comment above specifically said: > The value of the Claude attribution is that you can tell at a glance who used AI. Specifies none of that, which is why I was asking the…
> Musk bought Twitter looking to build an “everything app,” Part of me thinks he knows he lying and is just trying to drum up money and the other part thinks he's one of the most delusional and uninformed people in tech.
It does as of EF Core 8 or 9. One of the challenges for their team I'm assuming is making sure the release notes also get copied to the actual documentation. This was one case where I thought the same thing and only…
What was the request? Also, Claude refuses political stuff in general, not just your specific beliefs.
> 1. They pretend SQL is standardized, and support a heavily reduced featureset for any given database as a result EF Core is provider-specific and also exposes provider-specific functionality. > 4. You end up not…
With the big exception of Entity Framework which relies on LINQ.
> I know only a few ORM's but it seems they end up just adding another layer of DTO objects that are entirely separate from the domain classes anyway. Entity Framework in particular has come a long way in this regard.…
So again, you can train people but not AI? That's literally what you've said and now moving the goal posts in a way that makes no difference to what you said being patently wrong. It's wild having to argue with people…
> Frankly, I'm sure if people wanted to sneak in an AI generated code by carefully reviewing it and making sure it's targeted and well tested But this is exactly the point I'm making. If the code is carefully reviewed,…
Saying you didn't use AI when you did, regardless of the end product, is lying. What definition of the word lie wouldn't cover that?
A social contract? You invented that out of thin air. They're a means to an end not some discussion on philosophy.
lol Human beings are famously not already trained.
So when you said "AI cant be trained" you didn't mean "AI cant be trained" you meant that you personally can't? lol.
> can be trained to make it good and also improves the community. AI can be trained. Also, AI can create code that improves the community. It's replies like this that leave me even more confused.
> A pull request is a social artifact whose value and meaning is dependent on its author; Says who? How can you say I'm categorically wrong when your entire point rests upon an opinion?
YES! "No AI" policies that are purely based on technical grounds make no sense to me. Bad PR's are bad PR's regardless of their source. Are we really in a situation where good code that solves a problem won't be merged…
> The problem is that a lot of AI contributions are lazily produced without review. That sounds like a contributor problem. Not an AI problem. I still don't understand a "no AI" policy whose only purpose is to weed out…
> If the models (and harnesses) keep getting better at the same pace for the foreseeable years, we are heading to a world where the profession is commoditized to the ground. There's this talk about Jevons Paradox but I…
lol what?
Not really. I'm a recovering addict, felon, and have depression (lucky me). And though there were times where I could work an entire weekend without stopping, it was always followed by 2-3 days of doing absolutely…
Recovered opiate addict and for me it was a mix of everything: Some advice I had gotten from NA meetings, finally doing something about the other mental health issues I was dealing with, and most importantly:…
Just having this discussion with someone about AI in healthcare and how issues are going to be handled. If a nurse does something incorrectly, they can lose their license. Ensuring that nurse will never be a nurse…
That's fair. I guess at that point I think adding a label to the repo as opposed to the commit would make more sense to me.
Slightly related: I was in an interview once where it was the CEO, lead dev, and lead designer and inevitable "What are your weaknesses?" question came up. I answered honestly, which was that not only am I really bad at…
Are you intentionally misreading my comments? I asked a simple question: What technical concerns could possibly exist if the code is good? I made it very clear I wasn't talking about personal, political, or ethical…
Obviously people have those concerns. The comment above specifically said: > The value of the Claude attribution is that you can tell at a glance who used AI. Specifies none of that, which is why I was asking the…