"You enter legal hot water" in the USA. Not in Australia where this was written.
It isn't explained in that section of the article, but after I ask the original question, I will probe again multiple times to try to uncover the depth of a candidate's knowledge. It can be difficult with some questions…
Author here. That's a fair point. Interviews will never be fully two-way. The intent of the point is to allow them to correct misunderstanding I as the interviewer may have (making it slightly better than me going away…
It's interesting the legal differences between Australia and where you are from (I presume USA). In Australia, there is very little risk of lawsuits. When terminating someone, you have to have give a reason for…
OP here. It's fascinating reading people's interpretation of both the intent of the article and also me. I'm happy to answer any questions if people want.
"You enter legal hot water" in the USA. Not in Australia where this was written.
It isn't explained in that section of the article, but after I ask the original question, I will probe again multiple times to try to uncover the depth of a candidate's knowledge. It can be difficult with some questions…
Author here. That's a fair point. Interviews will never be fully two-way. The intent of the point is to allow them to correct misunderstanding I as the interviewer may have (making it slightly better than me going away…
It's interesting the legal differences between Australia and where you are from (I presume USA). In Australia, there is very little risk of lawsuits. When terminating someone, you have to have give a reason for…
OP here. It's fascinating reading people's interpretation of both the intent of the article and also me. I'm happy to answer any questions if people want.