all of those predictions seem to have come true
i love this idea but i wish there was a simple way to play the sounds of whatever is currently selected. perhaps a play button near the top of the page or a spacebar hotkey
You're absolutely right! There was a crime. I appreciate the course correction—it’s a significant oversight on my part. I've updated our previous plan to better reflect that a crime occurred. You're under arrest.
You need a minimum threshold of karma in order to downvote others on HN. Additionally, accounts with more well received activity are harder to identify as shills. That's why there are black markets where social media…
which can then translate to real-world money points
TLDR: "Just do it." ~ Nike
You didn't state any complex tasks though. You only stated programmers who use LLMs.
Urgent updates can be necessary every once in a while but should be recognized as technical failures on the part of the developers. Failure can be forgiven, but only so many times. The comments saying "what about X…
The study references "clinicians" rather than "doctors." Clinicians include psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, physicians, paramedics, etc.
66% accuracy is not "great" and definitely not the best there's ever been.
for perspective, here's what 500k gallons (~0.04% of the eruption) of water vapor looks like: https://youtu.be/BIpeNs5OWbo?t=103
thanks. is the nomination and voting a built in reddit feature? if so, this sounds like a good time to use it.
Aren't you on an alternative right now?
how were those moderators chosen the first time around? what's to prevent them from repeating that selection process? it might take a bit of work but the circumstances seem to merit at least that much.
but its people aren't allowed in? doesn't this prove reddit is not its people but rather a small group of moderators?
can someone explain why Reddit staff doesn't just forcibly reopen these subs and perma-ban their moderators?
> No one wants to look in the mirror and admit that Then that includes the employees and executives at Amazon and is all the more reason to not allow them to punish others for behavior that is (according to you)…
> in an ML testing context OP was not speaking in the ML testing context, hence the misunderstanding.
Right, so it can no longer be used to warn other viewers about scams and clickbait.
The test is novel to the program, just not its programmer. So are we testing the program or are we actually testing its programmer? If we're testing the program, then the programmer's foreknowledge is irrelevant.
Many =/= Most. The dislike ratio was extremely reliable when it came to identifying clickbait. Maybe you don't care about that but many others do.
If it is incorporated, its definitely not effective. Clickbait dominates Youtube's recommendations and search despite consistently low thumb ratings. An easy example would be a procedurally generated channel such as…
if its "not that much" and creates deception then why make site-wide changes that make it even less transparent? If a video had 4k dislikes and 46k likes then you knew that 4k accounts disliked it. There's little room…
> There would be no need for review bomb if they were widely disliked. This is circular reasoning. You're calling something a "review bomb" because you're assuming from the outset that its not widely disliked, despite…
The value of the dislike button was in warning other viewers about scams and clickbait. If you watch a bad video, realize its clickbait, and then simply move on that would be rewarding the clickbaiter and making the…
all of those predictions seem to have come true
i love this idea but i wish there was a simple way to play the sounds of whatever is currently selected. perhaps a play button near the top of the page or a spacebar hotkey
You're absolutely right! There was a crime. I appreciate the course correction—it’s a significant oversight on my part. I've updated our previous plan to better reflect that a crime occurred. You're under arrest.
You need a minimum threshold of karma in order to downvote others on HN. Additionally, accounts with more well received activity are harder to identify as shills. That's why there are black markets where social media…
which can then translate to real-world money points
TLDR: "Just do it." ~ Nike
You didn't state any complex tasks though. You only stated programmers who use LLMs.
Urgent updates can be necessary every once in a while but should be recognized as technical failures on the part of the developers. Failure can be forgiven, but only so many times. The comments saying "what about X…
The study references "clinicians" rather than "doctors." Clinicians include psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, physicians, paramedics, etc.
66% accuracy is not "great" and definitely not the best there's ever been.
for perspective, here's what 500k gallons (~0.04% of the eruption) of water vapor looks like: https://youtu.be/BIpeNs5OWbo?t=103
thanks. is the nomination and voting a built in reddit feature? if so, this sounds like a good time to use it.
Aren't you on an alternative right now?
how were those moderators chosen the first time around? what's to prevent them from repeating that selection process? it might take a bit of work but the circumstances seem to merit at least that much.
but its people aren't allowed in? doesn't this prove reddit is not its people but rather a small group of moderators?
can someone explain why Reddit staff doesn't just forcibly reopen these subs and perma-ban their moderators?
> No one wants to look in the mirror and admit that Then that includes the employees and executives at Amazon and is all the more reason to not allow them to punish others for behavior that is (according to you)…
> in an ML testing context OP was not speaking in the ML testing context, hence the misunderstanding.
Right, so it can no longer be used to warn other viewers about scams and clickbait.
The test is novel to the program, just not its programmer. So are we testing the program or are we actually testing its programmer? If we're testing the program, then the programmer's foreknowledge is irrelevant.
Many =/= Most. The dislike ratio was extremely reliable when it came to identifying clickbait. Maybe you don't care about that but many others do.
If it is incorporated, its definitely not effective. Clickbait dominates Youtube's recommendations and search despite consistently low thumb ratings. An easy example would be a procedurally generated channel such as…
if its "not that much" and creates deception then why make site-wide changes that make it even less transparent? If a video had 4k dislikes and 46k likes then you knew that 4k accounts disliked it. There's little room…
> There would be no need for review bomb if they were widely disliked. This is circular reasoning. You're calling something a "review bomb" because you're assuming from the outset that its not widely disliked, despite…
The value of the dislike button was in warning other viewers about scams and clickbait. If you watch a bad video, realize its clickbait, and then simply move on that would be rewarding the clickbaiter and making the…