I agree with you, but I don't know why you bothered. Articles like this just aren't worth responding to anymore. They probably never were.
Right, the format affords generic description documents from which to generate client code. This seems very similar in spirit to WSDL. No?
Am I right in thinking about this like a WSDL, but based on JSON?
I agree with you, but I don't know why you bothered. Articles like this just aren't worth responding to anymore. They probably never were.
Right, the format affords generic description documents from which to generate client code. This seems very similar in spirit to WSDL. No?
Am I right in thinking about this like a WSDL, but based on JSON?